Editor’s Note: Below is Igor Strelkov’s latest text. I share his assessment – with one big caveat. That is, that his idea that the compromise of an “axis of resistance” is a one-sided action. What I see is a two-sided action. Not only are Syria, Lebanon, and Iran imploding in a rather mysterious way, but this also applies to Israel. One can see the war in Ukraine is also fake in many ways (see my post …..), and there is an atmosphere of unreality surrounding all the events going back to the dismantling of the USSR.
It is quite conceivable that a global dismantling of national armies and nation-based interest is being pursued on a long-term basis. And this notion of creating a multipolar world is indeed the agenda of the Masters of the Universe, but with a twist. The new multipolarity is not based on national boundaries and national sovereignty but on the model of multinational corporations. That is, entities that cut across multiple nations, a melting pot of sorts, around the world. That means that the warrior class is being eliminated not only from the “axis” but from Israel, too, which has been profoundly damaged since the war with Hamas. We are witnessing the erosion of one party, then a reversal – the erosion of the other party – so that no side can claim victory, only embarrassment after embarrassment.
If this model of development is correct, then we will witness the dismantling of Russia as well, as a multinational empire, among other things. The US is already a multiracial territory and so is Europe. China is still resilient but for how long?
In the very end, some decades from now, a multiracial elite of the world will be formed against a multiracial class of the hoi polloi.
*********************
IGOR STRELKOV: MOSCOW’S POSITIONS WILL BE VERY VULNERABLE IN FRONT OF THE USA AND THE EU
[…]
By the way, you are absolutely “on point” suggested that “the situation could change radically over the weekend” (in the area of the “Middle East” (now – “12-day”) war). – I am even somewhat “shocked” by the (even “intermediate”) result with which all this disgrace ended. I have strong suspicions that a state coup in Iran – “for the sake of the war” the leadership of the IRGC and the “allied” military-political structures associated with it were eliminated/destroyed, after which (since this coup was agreed upon in advance with the USA and Israel) the war was stopped, as having achieved all its goals. A fairly logical chain is being built: the “sudden accidental death” of the Iranian president – the subsequent withdrawal of Iranian forces from Syria – the defeat of Hezbollah by Israel (with a “very restrained reaction from Iran”) – the defeat of the Houthi military structure in Yemen (with a very restrained reaction from Iran) – the rapid fall of the Assad regime, which has lost external support – and, finally, a massive strike by the Israeli Air Force, supported from within by a large-scale sabotage campaign that disabled the Iranian air defense forces (which was completely “blown away” by Iranian counterintelligence and security services), – the destruction of the leadership of the IRGC and the Air Force, the General Staff, with complete disregard for the “spiritual leaders” (at the same time – as Lev Vershinin noted – there was a wave of murders of people associated with the IRGC in the state apparatus, etc.). – Then a powerful strike by the United States only on nuclear facilities and … and that’s it. “The war is over – everyone won!” (Israel, and Iran, and the USA). – “Thank you all, everyone is free!” To this we can add the inexplicably passive reaction of China (as if the Chinese were warned in advance about the short-term nature of this “farce”). If this hypothesis is true, then very soon Iran will “warm up” greatly to the USA and Israel (if not in words, then in deeds) and the USA will also “suddenly” begin to gradually lift sanctions from “obedient Tehran”. Let’s see… This process is not simple and can be disrupted at any moment by any of the parties (for example, in Iran for domestic political reasons, where they will now “divide the legacy of the IRGC”).
For Russia, in any case, the situation has only worsened: firstly, we were rather rudely “shown our place in the gallery” in response to our offer to “mediate”; secondly, if Iran is “brought to heel” (i.e., the US and Co. begin to regain control over this country) – we can’t expect anything good from this; and thirdly: having won in Iran, Trump will return “to the field of Ukrainian settlement” as a “triumphant” (with the slogan “peace through strength”) – and will return with an order of magnitude tougher (in relation to Russia) position. His impudence (backed up by the rapid success he has just achieved) will increase many times over, and Moscow’s position (which will suddenly find itself again facing the “united front” of the US and the EU) will be very vulnerable. And won’t it turn out that the recent “bravura-victorious” statements at the SPIEF (not backed up by anything – no real military successes) will possibly be replaced by completely different ones? – Also “we’ll see”. As for our own war (i.e., the SVO), the June successes are not particularly impressive: the enemy front is still not broken through and is very, very slowly “crawling away” to distances that in military science cannot even claim to be called “operational success”. And this is very sad.
With respect, I.V. Girkin
06/25/2025
/ excerpt from a letter to comrade Frol Vladimirov/